The Yankees beat the Red Sox last night at Fenway Park by a score of 4-3. As a result, New York won their weekend series in Boston 2-1 and took the season series from their archrivals from Beantown 10-8. The Yankees held their 2.5 game Wild Card lead over Detroit as well. This game pitted Roger Clemens and Curt Schilling for the first time since the epic Game 7 of the 2001 World Series. The two games were so similar that it is almost frightening.
Just as he did on that November night six years ago, Clemens pitched a great game. The Rocket again left in the 7th inning after giving up 1 run. The score was 1-1 when he departed just like it was at Bank One Ballpark. Back in 2001, Clemens was looking to prove that he could come up big in big games. In this start, he was looking to prove that he was over his elbow ailment and could still deliver a good outing. He did just that. Roger was clearly aided by the long layoff as he cruised after a rocky 1st inning. The Rocket wanted to make sure that what could be his final start in Fenway Park was memorable. Holding a lineup like that to 2 hits in 6 innings certainly did the job. With Mike Mussina’s velocity back, the Yankees might consider a six man rotation at least for a turn. Clemens seems to thrive on long rest. Prior to this, his best start of the season came against Detroit after he had skipped a start. His aging body can use as much time off as it can get. The Yankees can afford to give it to him in the short term with all of their pitching depth.
Clemens got great support by his defense once again. In Bank One Ballpark, that came on a Derek Jeter relay throw. Last night it was the work of Doug Mientkiewicz at first. Making his first start since coming off the DL, Mientkiewicz made several brilliant plays at first base, none better than a diving stop in the 1st inning that saved 2 runs and ended the inning. Had the ball gotten by him, Boston would have been ahead 3-0, and Clemens would have started doubting his ability to pitch through this elbow problem, potentially leading to a short night and real questions of whether he should stay in the rotation. Instead, the inning came to an abrupt close, and Roger got stronger as the game progressed. Mientkiewicz also had a pair of hits off Schilling, including a single in the 8th that helped the 3 run inning along. Doug should get the next few starts at first to see whether he can springboard from this multihit game to get on a roll with the bat. Even if he can hit a little bit, his defense justifies a spot in this strong lineup. Playing Mientkiewicz also will allow Joe Torre to use Jason Giambi off the bench for a weak hitter at the bottom of the lineup as he did last night. Had Giambi started, Torre might have had to stick with Jose Molina in a key 8th inning at bat instead of sending Jason to the plate. Giambi responded with a key double. By using him as a pinch hitter, the Yankees will get less at bats from him, but they can make sure that the at bats he does get will be critical ones that otherwise would have gone to weak hitters.
Yankees middle relief had to pitch out of trouble just as it did against Arizona. This time it was Joba Chamberlain, not Mike Stanton on the mound. He had to deal with a runner on third with one out in the 7th, not a man on first with one out. The results were ultimately the same. Chamberlain struck out Julio Lugo and then got Jacoby Ellsbury to ground out to end the inning and win a battle between touted Native American prospects. Chamberlain gave up his first earned run the next inning on a Mike Lowell homer, but impressively shook that and a raucous Fenway Park off by striking J.D. Drew, the next hitter, out. In doing so, Joba passed the final and most difficult test of becoming a successful Major Leaguer, responding to failure.
Just as he was in Game 7, Curt Schilling was at the top of his game early. The only run he gave up in the first 7 innings was on a homerun he surrendered to a free-swinging second baseman. On Sunday night, that second baseman was Robinson Cano, not Alfonso Soriano. Cano is starting to demonstrate a mastery of Schilling. He now has 3 homers in his past 2 games against Gehrig38. Like he did in Phoenix, Schilling ran out of gas in the 8th inning. He was one pitch away from escaping trouble when Derek Jeter launched a game-winning 3 run homer against Schilling, coming through in the clutch as he has so many times before. Derek’s 11th homer of 2007 gave the Yankees a 4-1 lead and knocked Boston’s starter from the game just as Soriano’s 8th inning homer finished Schilling six years ago. Jeter’s homer proved the winning margin just as his homer in Game 4 of that 2001 World Series, which was started by Schilling, did for the Yankees.
Just as he did in the desert, Joe Torre turned to Mariano Rivera to protect the lead. Mariano showed as little command as he did on that fateful night. After beginning the inning ahead 4-2, Mo gave up a hit, hit a batter, and walked a pair. Boston had closed within 4-3, and the game would be decided by the best hitter on the opposing team, just as it was in Game 7. This time, though, Mariano had something left in the tank. He pulled back and got David Ortiz to pop up to shortstop to end the game. It turns out the game was not an exact replica of the last time Schilling and Clemens squared off. This time the ending was happy.
The Yankees now head home. They are in the driver’s seat for the Wild Card with only games against the bottom of the East remaining. Tonight Baltimore pays a visit to the Bronx. Some might fret this, given how tough the Orioles have played the Yankees this season. However, that was before the Orioles decided to mail in their season. The Baltimore team that comes to the Bronx this week is officially playing out the string. In one of many parallels to the 2005 season, fans can take heart in remembering how New York fared against the Devil Rays that year. Tampa Bay owned the Bronx Bombers all year until the Yanks swept a critical late September series. A similar result would not be shocking at all.
Perry: Red Sox Are Baseball’s Best Because I Said So
Dayn Perry of FoxSports.com recently wrote an article on the website proclaiming the Red Sox as the best organization in baseball. This seems like a valid enough position. There is no question that the guys up in Boston have done a great job in building that franchise. Even the most diehard Yankees fan can admit that. The problem comes with his criteria. There is absolutely no discernible way that the Red Sox beat the Yankees in a number of his arguments.
All of this is true. Henry and company are much better than greedy misers like Loria and Pohlad. He does a great job investing in his product, and the fans have to appreciate that. The problems start with Perry’s payroll argument. Everybody knows that the Yankees have the game’s highest payroll. If that is a reflection of having an owner who spends, the Yanks do not lose in this category. The Red Sox may lock up some veteran performers, but they also refused to spend the money to keep the heart and soul of their team, Johnny Damon, from going to their hated rivals. The difference in salaries was reportedly $3 million annually. That is a drop in the bucket for a team with Boston’s money. Sox ownership also claimed poverty in refusing to pick up Bobby Abreu from the Phillies even though they showed in the offseason that the money was there. That shoots a hole in the taking on salary at the deadline better than the Yankees argument.
Brian Cashman won three World Series rings with smaller payrolls than Epstein was working with when he won his one. Look at the way his moves rebuilt the 2000 World Champions on the fly. Look at the scrap heap pickups he made in 2005 that propelled the Yanks to the postseason. Look at the way he has taken one of the game’s worst farm systems and turned it into one of the best in the two years he has gained full autonomy. Look at how his relentless calls to the Rangers convinced Texas to trade Alex Rodriguez to New York. Cashman certainly has had help, primarily from Damon Oppenheimer, a man whose firing I called for back in 2005. Oppenheimer was responsible for the drafting of Ian Kennedy and Joba Chamberlain last year. Gene Michael is one of the most innovative minds in baseball. He had the Yankees focusing on on base percentage a decade before Moneyball popularized the statistic. Mark Newman is a highly-respected baseball man. The Yankees own a formidable front office.
This is just ridiculous. Matsuzaka and Okajima were free agent acquisitions. Gabbard did help, but he is gone now in exchange for Eric Gagne, which has not looked like a great trade to this point. Perry does name a few valid players for his argument. Pedroia has been great. Ellsbury and Bucholz have been good so far. So has Papelbon. Lester has a ton of potential. However, if we are going to praise Theo for finding Cla Meredith, why not criticize for trading him for a below average backup catcher, Doug Mirabelli? Why does he get credit for Bannister but none for failing to sign him? Murton he gets a pass on since that was part of the Orlando Cabrera deal that helped them win the 2004 World Series.
The main point is that there is no way Perry can argue these guys have had more of an impact than the Yankees’ young talent has. Chien-Ming Wang and Robinson Cano filled gaping holes in the 2005 team. Melky Cabrera did in 2006. Joba Chamberlain solidified a shaky bullpen in 2007. Phil Hughes and Ian Kennedy have held down rotation spots that were question marks. Outside of Papelbon and Pedroia, no homegrown talent has had much of impact since the Red Sox jumped out to a seemingly insurmountable lead in the East this season. One could include Okajima, who was a legitimate steal on the free agent market, but Daisuke Matsuzaka has been up and down all season and is fading. That signing has not justified the money so far.
Let us ignore the question of why there is no outcome for Matsuzaka possible aside from getting better. The trend for Japanese starters has been that they get hit harder once the league sees them, but that discussion is for another time. The Yankees have by far the most popular player in Japanese baseball. Perry even admits that the Red Sox are not distinguishably better than the Yankees in this area.
Finally, Perry can demonstrate an area where Boston beats New York. The Red Sox lead in road attendance. How valid are his findings, though? Is the sample size too small? This is the first time since 2001 that the Yankees have not led that category (The Yanks finished ahead of the Red Sox in 2001 also). For some reason, Perry uses out of date Forbes franchise values. The Red Sox are worth $724 million in 2007. The Yankees finish ahead again.
The Yankees have been steadfast in their refusal to deal top prospects like Cano, Wang, Cabrera, Kennedy, Hughes, Chamberlain, Alan Horne, and others. That is sticking to a vision. The jury is still out on what the Red Sox did. They are having starting pitchingissues, and they sent an extremely talented pitching coming off a no-hitter out of the rotation. There is no conceivable way to make a final assessment of any merit on that move at this point. It might work out, but it is in no way a slam dunk.
The Red Sox have won the most games this season. That is why they are the envy of baseball. This is not to say that they do not have the best organization in baseball. It is not to say that they do either. It is simply a critique of a poorly written and researched article. Perry did not successfully argue one area where the Red Sox have a clear advantage over the Yankees. The Yankees were discernibly better in many of his talking points. Boston may run the best organization in baseball, but Perry did nothing to prove that the Red Sox trump the Yankees.